Sandboxed AI: Deploying LLMs in Air-Gapped Environments
Real implementation for financial services - performance vs security trade-offs nobody talks about.
"No external internet access. No cloud APIs. No data leaves our network. Ever."
- CISO at a major investment bank, crushing our original architecture
Challenge accepted. Here's how we deployed GPT-4 level capabilities inside their bunker.
The Air-Gap Reality in Financial Services
While startups debate OpenAI vs Anthropic APIs, enterprise lives in a different world. No internet. No cloud. Just regulatory requirements that make Fort Knox look casual.
The Non-Negotiables:
- Zero external network connections
- All data processed within physical premises
- No telemetry, no phone-home, no exceptions
- Full audit trail for every inference
- Deterministic outputs for regulatory review
Why Cloud LLMs Break in Enterprise
1. Data Residency Laws
EU financial data can't leave EU. Swiss banking data can't leave Switzerland. US healthcare data... you get the idea. Cloud APIs don't care about borders.
2. The Audit Trail Nightmare
Regulator: "Show us exactly what the AI saw and decided for trade #8472819"
You: "Well, OpenAI processed it..."
Regulator: "Shut it down."
3. IP and Trade Secrets
Sending proprietary trading algorithms to external APIs? That's how competitors learn your strategies. Or worse, how you end up in court.
The Architecture That Actually Ships
The Model Selection Dilemma
Open Source Models That Work
Llama 3 70B
Best general-purpose performance. Runs on 2x A100 80GB.
Use for: Complex reasoning, analysis, report generation
Mistral 7B
Excellent for fine-tuning. Runs on single GPU.
Use for: Domain-specific tasks, classification, extraction
CodeLlama 34B
Purpose-built for code generation and analysis.
Use for: SQL generation, code review, script automation
Phi-3
Tiny but mighty. Runs on CPU efficiently.
Use for: Edge deployment, high-volume simple tasks
Quantization: The Performance Multiplier
70B model → 4-bit quantization → 35GB VRAM
Performance loss: ~3%
Speed gain: 4x
Cost reduction: 75%
We use GPTQ for inference optimization and maintain FP16 versions for critical accuracy tasks.
Hardware: The Uncomfortable Truth
Forget cloud elasticity. You're buying metal. Here's what actually works:
Production Configuration (1000 users, sub-second latency)
Inference Cluster:
4x servers with 8x NVIDIA A100 80GB each
2TB RAM per server (yes, really)
NVLink for multi-GPU models
Estimated cost: $800K
Storage:
200TB NVMe for model weights
1PB for vector store (customer data)
Distributed filesystem (Ceph/GlusterFS)
Networking:
100Gb InfiniBand between nodes
Completely isolated from external networks
Redundant switches for HA
Security Architecture for Paranoid Enterprises
Layer 1: Physical Security
- Servers in locked cages with biometric access
- No USB ports, no external media
- Hardware security modules (HSMs) for key management
- Air-gapped means AIR-GAPPED - no exceptions
Layer 2: Software Hardening
# Every inference request tracked
{
"request_id": "req_8f7a9c2d",
"user": "trader_4892",
"model": "llama3-70b-q4",
"input_hash": "sha256:a9b7c8d9...",
"output_hash": "sha256:f8e7d6c5...",
"timestamp": "2024-03-21T14:32:00Z",
"tokens_in": 487,
"tokens_out": 234,
"inference_time_ms": 342,
"purpose": "risk_analysis",
"data_classification": "highly_confidential"
}Layer 3: Access Control
- Role-based access to specific models
- Data segregation by department/project
- Automatic PII detection and masking
- Immutable audit logs shipped to SIEM
Performance vs Security Trade-offs
The Brutal Reality
Air-gapped LLMs are 5-10x slower than cloud APIs. Every security layer adds latency. But when the alternative is regulatory shutdown, performance is negotiable.
Optimization Strategies That Work
- 1.Aggressive Caching: 60% of prompts are variations of the same questions. Semantic cache with 0.95 similarity threshold.
- 2.Model Cascading: Try Phi-3 first, escalate to Llama 70B only if needed. 80% handled by small models.
- 3.Batch Processing: Group similar requests. Process overnight when possible. Real-time only when required.
- 4.Specialized Models: Fine-tuned 7B models for specific tasks outperform general 70B models.
The Deployment Playbook
Phase 1: Infrastructure (Weeks 1-4)
- Procure hardware (GPUs have 12+ week lead times)
- Set up air-gapped environment with security team
- Install base OS, drivers, CUDA stack
- Implement network isolation and monitoring
Phase 2: Model Deployment (Weeks 5-8)
- Transfer model weights via physical media
- Set up model serving infrastructure (vLLM/TGI)
- Implement load balancing and failover
- Build monitoring and alerting
Phase 3: Security & Compliance (Weeks 9-12)
- Implement comprehensive audit logging
- Set up RBAC and data segregation
- Security penetration testing
- Compliance documentation and sign-off
Real-World Gotchas We Hit
GPU Memory Fragmentation
After 72 hours of continuous inference, memory fragmentation killed performance. Solution: Nightly model reload during maintenance windows.
Update Hell
No internet means no package managers. Every Python package, every dependency, manually transferred. We now maintain an internal mirror.
Debugging Blindness
No cloud logging, no external monitoring. Built comprehensive internal observability before we could even start optimization.
The Economics of Air-Gapped AI
Initial Investment: - Hardware: $800K - $1.2M - Setup & Integration: $300K - Annual Maintenance: $200K Cloud API Equivalent Cost: - 1000 users × 100 queries/day × $0.02 = $2K/day - Annual: $730K Break-even: 18 months 5-year TCO advantage: $2.4M Plus: Complete data control, no regulatory risk
Advanced Patterns for Scale
1. Federated Learning Without Internet
Multiple air-gapped sites need model improvements. Solution: Differential privacy + sneakernet.
Each site trains locally → Encrypted weight deltas to physical media → Central aggregation → Updated models distributed back → No data leaves any site
2. Hybrid Inference Pipeline
Not everything needs 70B parameters:
Classification → Phi-3 (200ms) ↓ If complex → Mistral 7B (500ms) ↓ If critical → Llama 70B (2s) 90% handled by small models Average latency: 280ms
Making It Work in Your Enterprise
Pre-Flight Checklist
- ✓Get security team buy-in FIRST (they can kill anything)
- ✓Budget for 2x the hardware you think you need
- ✓Plan for 3-month deployment, not 3-week
- ✓Build internal expertise - vendors can't help in air-gaps
- ✓Start with one use case, prove value, then expand
The Bottom Line
Air-gapped AI isn't easy. It's expensive, complex, and slower than cloud. But for regulated enterprises, it's the only path to production AI.
Do it right, and you're the hero who brought AI to the enterprise. Do it wrong, and you're explaining to regulators why customer data ended up in OpenAI's training set.
Need AI inside your fortress?
We've deployed LLMs in banks, governments, and defense contractors. Let's talk about your air-gap requirements.
Discuss Sandboxed AI Deployment